car techie

Custom Search

Accessories     Absorber      Air-conditioning     Alignment     Battery    Car news     Car photos     Carburetor     Clutch      Compression     Color      Converter    Disc brakes    Door    Engine    Gasket   Gear    Glass     Ignition     Light     Maintenance     Oil / fuel



Buy a car
What a waste

Question : My Suzuki ERV 1.3 litre (2002) has clocked 83,000km, which means it's time to have the timing belt changed. I was informed by Suzuki that when I change the timing belt, I should also change the water pump as well because if the water pump needs to be replaced (after I have changed the timing belt), I will have to replace the timing belt again. But replacing the water pump, which is still in good working condition, sounds wasteful. Also, is it true that cars which use timing chains instead of timing belts, do not need to have their chains replaced?

Answer :

1. The mechanic may be correct in a way because he may have found out in practice that the water pump usually fails not long after the timing belt is replaced and therefore suggests you replace it at the same time. However, you do not have to replace it as the labour to replace the pump at a later date is not that high and it it is not making any noise and operating perfectly well, I see no reason why you should throw away some- thing that is still good.

2. Timing chains, being made of steel, tend to last for a very long time and are seldom replaced, at least during the time the car is with the first owner.


Timing chain or timing belt

When to change

What a waste

Change chain when it rattles

Time to change timing chain

Self service

Elantra suddenly stopped


Safer to change other bits, too

Doubting the manufacturer

Belt too tight

Timing chain

Belt or chain?

Timing Belt

Timing chain

Spark plugs
Timing belt


Car related sites are welcome for exchanging links