Chain versus belt
Question : WHAT are the
advantages and disadvantages of chain and belt drive trains in terms of
durability and maintenance costs ?
Also, the recirculating ball and nut verses rack and pinion.
Lastly, the common rail direct fuel injection versus the electrical fuel
injection turbo diesel.
What are their advantages in terms of performance and cost of maintenance
plus fuel economy ?
Answer : You cannot expect a detailed reply to such technical
questions and so I will only give you a brief reply to each :
1. To my mind, the chain drive is better than the belt drive for the
Also, chains do not snap without warning and last almost forever.
However, the chain is noisy and it is more complicated to keep it in good
Belts on the other hand are much quieter but must be replaced at regular
intervals or else you could end up with very bent valves and even a scrap
Belts are not cheap and usually replacing the belt also entails replacing the
idlers and their hearings which can come up to quite a hefty sum.
2. The recirculating ball steering tends to be quieter and does not require
as frequent adjustment as the rack and pinion.
Rack and pinion steerings have very limited adjustment and once that is taken
up, the rack can make all sorts of noises.
Rack and pinion power steering units also have a higher tendency for leakage.
3. I think you are talking about a common rail system as opposed to a unit
I would prefer the common rail system for its efficiency and fuel
consumption, although the operating pressures are much higher and there is a
need to ensure that fuel used is clean.